
At some point, once you’ve taken in enough information about the damage being done to the human brain by the modern algorithmic, attention-sucking, venture capital vampire-driven internet, you start looking for a way out.
Maybe you’ve seen your own attention span atrophy over the years, and wonder why you can’t read more than five pages of a book without wanting to pick up your phone. Or perhaps you’re highly suspicious of any gains you’ll personally see from the AI being crammed down your throat by your workplace, by parts of the media, and by every tech company you perhaps once respected. Or it may just be as simple as an altruistic concern that without person-by-person changes in how we approach what the 21st century internet has bequeathed to us – mass stupidity, anxiety, MAGA, crypto, social media brainrot, extreme narcissism, AI slop and too many other pathologies to list – that we’re likely to be totally and truly hosed. As they say.
I mean, that’s what I’ve been thinking for quite some time, anyway. The writer Ed Zitron calls it “The Rot Economy”, and it’s about as perfect a description of the myriad forces that have combined to shovel a pile of money-making, brain-withering garbage at the eyeballs and into the keystrokes of every American and global citizen. Back when the internet was supposedly “good”, when technology companies were creating apps and gadgets and utilities that furthered and enhanced modern living, there was very little pushback and concern about the downsides that might come when Wall Street would need to see even larger profit margins, or when every square inch of an Instagram or even an Amazon.com would need to be monetized in every possible manner.
Like when I first got on Facebook in 2006 or whenever it was – what fun! All my friends and people from my past, posting stories and photos and musings, lined up in sequential order. Or Google, the big tech company whom at one time I defended publicly to others who might complain about them – the “don’t be evil” people who brought us “free” Google Maps, Google Docs and Google Search. Highly useful things! Wading through a few clearly-labeled sponsored search ads was a very small price to pay for all of that. Now both apps and both companies are prime examples of the growth-at-all-costs Rot Economy, as well as being partly responsible for the proverbial enshittification of the internet. This is a process that gets worse and worse every time I open a browser. 2024 and 2025 were the tipping point, and it’s finally time to make some changes.
There are many books written about the perils of the modern internet and what it’s doing to human brains and behavior; I’ve read several, and the two I most highly recommend are Nicolas Carr‘s Superbloom: How Technologies of Attention Tear Us Apart and Jenny Odell‘s How To Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy. Both writers figured it all out before I did, and their words have done much to help me try and plot out what path I’d take to unwind the damage I’d already done to myself.
It took a while, but I’ve started to make some adjustments to my life that are already paying dividends in the form of more time, less aggravation, better concentration and, honestly, a schadenfreude-esque sense of “JOMO” – the joy of missing out. But nothing changes until some significant number of us change. So here’s what happens to be working for me.
Start with the smartphone. Maybe you don’t need one?

This is my new phone. It’s the only “dumbphone” that my carrier T-Mobile offers. It was a mere $99 to buy it full-stop, then another $20/month to add it to my family plan. It has an internet browser (though you’ll only want to use it in something approximating an informational emergency); unlimited talking and texting; the ability to take, send and receive photos; and Google Maps – the single most useful app that the internet every produced.
I still have to hold onto my old smartphone due to work; our 2-factor authentication and all that – as well as the fact that I happen to work for a mobile technology company. But that one is now my secondary phone, the one lying on a counter in a distant room, and brought out as needed for work. The dumbphone is the phone, and aside from re-adjusting to the triple-tap texting I did in the early 2000s, I’m perfectly happy with forgoing the dopamine and turning that need for stimulation to some physical media instead, like a print magazine or a book.
Anything you can do on a computer or a smartphone, do it on the computer.
This is more to put in small, deliberate barriers that keep you from being totally ensnared on your device. You can go full dumbphone, but if you can’t (yet), at least head back to 2005-style internet usage and call up what you want to see on a laptop or desktop computer, rather than gratuitously reaching for the smartphone. It’s all still there, except maybe some of the social apps that I don’t use. To that end….
Get off social media.
This has been harder than I expected (update 10/5/25: actually it was easier than I thought). I like to create things, like this blog and this fanzine, and when I do things like that, I want to use the communications mechanisms that virtually everyone settled into the past twenty years to promote them – because that’s where the people are. When my wife passed away this year, after a short period I talked about it on Facebook and Instagram, and posted some fantastic photos of her through the years. People were supportive and loving and amazing.
So slinking away from those sites is a little tough. (Update 10/5/25: again, actually no it wasn’t). Twitter/X was not tough at all – that place is absolutely toxic and disgusting, and I quit years ago, pre-Musk. TikTok and the others, I don’t know, as I’m not interested. I know what they do to kids of my son’s generation, because I’ve watched the dopamine frenzy they engender, probably best exemplified by crosswalks full of zombies glued to their devices – one of the most depressing science fiction-esque emblems of our time as there is. Or perhaps try to go to a movie at a “cineplex” in 2025 and sit next to someone who doesn’t bring his or her phone out multiple times per film – I’ve been failing at this of late, and it’s heartbreaking for all of us.
For now, I’m keeping my two social sites and checking them each once per morning, although even this is leveling off (update 10/5/25 again – it’s leveled off in full – they gone!). Have you seen just how awful they are now? Instagram actually leads with two advertisements, followed by something you want to see, followed by another ad. Why bother? I reserve the right to post on these still, at least when I have something to promote, but for the most part I’d like to evolve to a point where I actually look at them twice a month year, maybe.
Practice “slow news”.
This one also requires a bit of willpower and possibly an outlay of money as well, but hear me out. I’d noticed just how pointless my rapacious news consumption was, and how it mostly just depressed me while also keeping me hooked into a screen. We’d subscribed to the print edition of the Friday/Saturday/Sunday NY Times for years, and I recently started just waiting around for those to really dig in deep to the world’s events over the weekend, and just checking headlines a couple times a day otherwise.
This was so freeing and helpful that I’ve now upped the game and subscribed to the print edition of the paper every day of the week. This will keep me off of my iPad and laptop, even, and I can open the paper each night like a dad in his armchair and seek to understand, rather than skim. Replace with your own favorite paper as necessary. I also supplement this with print subscriptions to The Atlantic, Sight and Sound, The Hockey News and New York magazines, as well as a series of Substack newsletters that come into my email inbox, and can be read at leisure. That’s me – like I said, your publications will vary. The point is that news doesn’t have to be fast and instantaneous; we’ve been conditioned by the internet to think so, of course, but just try to go slooooow news for a few days, then ask yourself if you really missed anything.
Avoid AI entirely with print books.
As enshittified as the internet has become in recent years, it is soon to collapse under its own weight as tech companies seek to monetize the absurd amounts of money they’ve spent on data centers and AI projects by moving everything to AI-driven slop. Silicon Valley, finding that it wasn’t able to easily innovate any longer and that it couldn’t create products and services that people actually wanted, are now force-feeding us something we don’t want, don’t need and didn’t ask for. It may be keeping the tax base of my city of San Francisco humming, which is great for the value of my house (for now), but it’s killing everything else – just ask a college professor, a journalist or some moron talking to ChatGPT like it’s his therapist.
This is the time to go back to books, real paper books with ideas and stories and empathy-enhancing characters. I’m reading more in 2023-2025 than I have in years, and I’m seeing my attention span finally snapped back to what it once was, where I can knock out 70-100 pages of a novel in a single sitting without any digital interruptions at all. It’s the best. AI can’t touch it, and there’s no slop to be seen anywhere.
So anyway, that’s what seems to be enabling me to further my own happiness and ensure I’m not too complicit in our collective downfall. Even writing this essay out and publishing it is a little “performative”, I’ll freely admit – something the internet surely taught me to do. Yet I think sharing my “plan” is a step toward hopefully encouraging others to take similar steps as well, not merely for their own betterment but as a cudgel to eventually turn the tide and help us get an internet built around people and their needs, not venture capitalists and theirs.





























