Best Books I Read in 2025

2025 will always be marked as a year of immense significance for me, having lost my wife and partner of 31 years, Rebecca Wyte, to cancer in April. Understandably, this has shaken me pretty profoundly, given that the time period I spent from being a 26-year-old dumbass to being a widower of 57 was defined and nurtured by my life with her. We had, in most senses of the term, a very good marriage that became even better over the years, and I know we were quite lucky in that respect.

My friend David gave me a book about grief and loss at Rebecca’s memorial service that he said had served him well when his mom passed away. In it, there was a bit about recognizing and embracing that you, the survivor, are now different than you’d been before, and that this might be a chance for some reinvention. “Maybe we can start from our shatteredness and build something new from the shards. Maybe this is an opportunity to be who we might have been”.

I kind of liked that as an organizing principal for how best to proceed in the months following her death. It likely had a role to play in my rejection of the modern technology-driven rot economy; in my “idiot’s quest” to walk every block of my city (which is going great, actually!); and in my prioritization of reading books – physical, paper books – over film, TV, live music, and especially over internet pursuits. My feeling was, and remains: as long as I’m staying social and active with other humans (which I am), and I’m not turning into a sad, lonely bookworm hermit – well then, stuffing my mind with great reading is potentially the best and most rewarding use of my time, along with family interaction (especially with my son); travel, exercise, and the Winnipeg Jets hockey team.

So I read 64 books in 2025, which I guess is a personal “record”. Hooray, wow! Funny enough, this was the year that I saw an inordinate amount of preening on the Substacks that I follow about books & bookishness: reading the great books, literacy, oh my god look at me, I read a lot, why doesn’t everyone read as hard as I do. So I just want to say I’m not that guy. But I sure do love a list! To wit, here’s what I read in 2025, and then we’re going to get into the Top Ten that I recommend, and why.

Books Read in 2025, in the order in which I read them
– Dorothy B Hughes – The So Blue Marble (1940)
– Tony TulathimutteRejection (2024)
– Philip Roth – Sabbath’s Theater (1995)
– Justin Wyatt – Three Women (2024)
– Philip Roth – Nemesis (2010)
– Michel Houellebecq – Whatever (1994)
– Nicolas Carr – Superbloom: How Technologies of Connection Tear Us Apart (2025)
– Solvej Balle – On The Calculation of Volume 1 (2024)
– Philip Roth – The Counterlife (1986)
– David Leonhardt – Ours Was The Shining Future: The Story of the American Dream (2023)
– Kingsley Amis – Ending Up (1974)
Denis Johnson – Angels (1983)
– F. Scott Fitzgerald – The Great Gatsby (1925)
– Barbara Ramos – A Fearless Eye: The Photography of Barbara Ramos: San Francisco and California, 1969–1973 (2025)
– Julian Barnes – The Sense of an Ending (2011)
– Bob Johnson – The Continental Divide: Stories (2025)
– Kent Haruf – Plainsong (1999)
– Philip Roth– When She Was Good (1967)
– Emma Pattee – Tilt (2025)
– Richard Neely – Shattered (1969)
– Philip Roth– The Prague Orgy (1985)
– Billups Allen– I Exhibited Films For A Year. I Lost Money, but I Think I Made My Point (2025)
– Michael Deagler– Early Sobrieties (2024)
– James M. Cain – Mildred Pierce (1941)
– Philip Roth – The Breast (1972)
– Bruce Pavitt – Sub Pop USA: The Subterranean Pop Music Anthology, 1980–1988 (2014)
– Philip Roth – The Anatomy Lesson (1983)
– John Fante – Dreams From Bunker Hill (1982)
– Fiona Mozley – Hot Stew (2021)
– Lisa Tuttle – My Death (2004)
– Brian Shanley – Dodged & Burned: Seminal Rock Photography 1976-1984 (2025)
Jeff & Steve McDonald – Now You’re One of Us: The Incredible Story of Redd Kross (2024)
– Philip Roth – Operation Shylock (1993)
– Tom Brinkmann – Bad Mags: The Strangest, Sleaziest, and Most Unusual Periodicals Ever Published! (2008)
– Steve Miller – Laughing Hyenas (2025)
– Scott Spires – Social Distancing: A Novel (2025)
– Meghan Daum – Catastrophe Hour: Selected Essays (2025)
– Leonardo Sciascia– To Each His Own (1966)
– Chelsea Bieker – Heartbroke (2022)
– Harold Pinter – The Birthday Party (1958)
Christine Rosen – The Extinction of Experience: Being Human in a Disembodied World (2024)
– Michelle Huneven – Bug Hollow (2025)
– Eric Crane – Faster Than The Speed of Sound: Vignettes from the Bay Area Thrash Metal Scene (2025)
– Philip Roth – Patrimony (1991)
– Vijay Khurana – The Passenger Seat (2025)
– Sahan Jayasuriya – Don’t Say Please: The Oral History of Die Kreuzen (2025)
– Darrell Kinsey – Natch (2025)
– Joseph MitchellOld Mr. Flood (1948)
– Josh Rosenthal, ed. – Treasures Untold: A Modern 78rpm Reader (2025)
– Emily Adrian – Seduction Theory (2025)
– Philip Roth – Exit Ghost (2007)
– Gwendoline Riley – First Love (2017)
– David Polonoff – Wannabeat: Hanging out … and hanging on … in Baby Beat San Francisco (2024)
– David Goodis – The Burglar (1953)
– Grégoire Bouillier – The Mystery Guest (2006)
– Philip Roth – Deception (1990)
– Flannery O’Connor – A Good Man Is Hard to Find and Other Stories (1953)
– Robert Crumb – Tales of Paranoia (2025)
– Genny SchorrAll Roads Lead To Punk (2025)
– Steven J. Zipperstein – Philip Roth: Stung By Life (2025)
– Ford Madox Ford – The Good Solider (1915)
– Pat Blashill – Someday All the Adults Will Die!: The Birth of Texas Punk (2025)
– Graham Greene – The Third Man/The Fallen Idol (1949)
– Fredrik DeBoer – The Mind Reels (2025)

Well. One thing comes to mind now that I have typed this out: there probably needs to be a “Philip Roth category”, and then a category for everything else. This was my year to try and complete the Roth canon, which I failed on. I read ten of his novels, which leaves me with five more of his books to read in 2026. He has become, let it be said, my all-time favorite novelist, and when I’m done with his 30 books, I’ll probably read 15-20 of them again before I leave this realm. So let’s break this into two.

In the “Best Books By Philip Roth That I Read in 2025” category, I award #1 to The Counterlife from 1986. A strange, surreal, satirical novel of Jewishness, family, Israel and self-absorption, told playfully from multiple perspectives and with some highly unreliable narration. It’s considered one of his classics because it is, indeed, a classic – and perhaps only bested in my eyes by The Ghost Writer and American Pastoral.

I’ll give a very close #2 to 1967’s When She Was Good, which not everyone loves, as it’s a true outlier in his catalog: a female protagonist, no Jews, and a sword of righteousness thrust at the reader in judgment, until our protagonist falls on her own sword. So, so good, and absolutely riveting. The only one of the ten I read I wasn’t wild about was Nemesis, his final novel from 2010, which, despite some interesting themes to chew on, is so much more light and airy than his denser work. It really reads like a book from a guy in his eighties who’s ready to close up shop – which is exactly what it was.

Top 10 Books I Read in 2025, non-Philip Roth Category

  1. Flannery O’Connor – A Good Man is Hard To Find and Other Stories
  2. Gwendoline Riley – First Love
  3. Bob Johnson – The Continental Divide: Stories
  4. Kent Haruf – Plainsong
  5. Emily Adrian – Seduction Theory
  6. Graham Greene – The Third Man and The Fallen Idol
  7. Chelsea Bieker – Heartbroke
  8. Nicolas Carr – Superbloom: How Technologies of Connection Pull Us Apart
  9. Scott Spires– Social Distancing: A Novel
  10. Michael Deagler – Early Sobrieties

Rather than praise the giants (Flannery O’Connor, Graham Greene), I want to focus on the five novels or story collections in here that either came out this year or within the past few years (post-pandemic), i.e. Chelsea Bieker‘s excellent Heartbroke from 2022. Bob Johnson’s The Continental Divide: Stories packed a real wallop, with a collection of tales of losers, left-behinds and the disgraced in a small Indiana town. Minus the gothic violence and the flights of rapture, it’s nearly as knockout a collection as the O’Connor book I read, with some of the same unnerving themes.

Emily Adrian‘s adultery tale Seduction Theory totally beguiled me, and at the end I was couldn’t believe how much I’d enjoyed a book about academics and their infidelities. Incredibly well-written, pulse-rushing and true to life. Scott Spires‘ excellent Social Distancing focuses on a father and adult son living together in Wisconsin and key themes of alienation, social fear and piney yet floral IPAs. It’s full of very recognizable human foibles and is also really, really funny. And a great companion book to that one is Early Sobrieties by Michael Deagler, centered on a 26-year-old recovering alcoholic, adrift and couch-surfing across a gentrifying Philadelphia.

If you’re looking to escape the rot economy yourself, you may be spurred into action by Nicolas Carr‘s Superbloom: How Technologies of Connection Pull Us Apart. I think it’s what tipped me over into deleting all of my social media accounts, one of the finest big-boy decisions I’ve ever made and something I don’t regret in the least.

Next year? Well, I’m going to finish those last 5 Roth books, and I’m going to read at least 3 books from the 1800s, including Anna Karenina, something I’ve long been wanting to tackle. I can also feel a major Graham Greene bender coming on – there are still at least ten of his novels I’ve never picked up. I also want to stay connected to new fiction, especially small-press fiction, as it’s clear that there are some real gems being published every year like the Spires, Deagler and Johnson books that I’d have been pretty bummed to have missed out on.

Opting Out of The Rot Economy

At some point, once you’ve taken in enough information about the damage being done to the human brain by the modern algorithmic, attention-sucking, venture capital vampire-driven internet, you start looking for a way out.

Maybe you’ve seen your own attention span atrophy over the years, and wonder why you can’t read more than five pages of a book without wanting to pick up your phone. Or perhaps you’re highly suspicious of any gains you’ll personally see from the AI being crammed down your throat by your workplace, by parts of the media, and by every tech company you perhaps once respected. Or it may just be as simple as an altruistic concern that without person-by-person changes in how we approach what the 21st century internet has bequeathed to us – mass stupidity, anxiety, MAGA, crypto, social media brainrot, extreme narcissism, AI slop and too many other pathologies to list – that we’re likely to be totally and truly hosed. As they say.

I mean, that’s what I’ve been thinking for quite some time, anyway. The writer Ed Zitron calls it “The Rot Economy”, and it’s about as perfect a description of the myriad forces that have combined to shovel a pile of money-making, brain-withering garbage at the eyeballs and into the keystrokes of every American and global citizen. Back when the internet was supposedly “good”, when technology companies were creating apps and gadgets and utilities that furthered and enhanced modern living, there was very little pushback and concern about the downsides that might come when Wall Street would need to see even larger profit margins, or when every square inch of an Instagram or even an Amazon.com would need to be monetized in every possible manner.

Like when I first got on Facebook in 2006 or whenever it was – what fun! All my friends and people from my past, posting stories and photos and musings, lined up in sequential order. Or Google, the big tech company whom at one time I defended publicly to others who might complain about them – the “don’t be evil” people who brought us “free” Google Maps, Google Docs and Google Search. Highly useful things! Wading through a few clearly-labeled sponsored search ads was a very small price to pay for all of that. Now both apps and both companies are prime examples of the growth-at-all-costs Rot Economy, as well as being partly responsible for the proverbial enshittification of the internet. This is a process that gets worse and worse every time I open a browser. 2024 and 2025 were the tipping point, and it’s finally time to make some changes.

There are many books written about the perils of the modern internet and what it’s doing to human brains and behavior; I’ve read several, and the two I most highly recommend are Nicolas Carr‘s Superbloom: How Technologies of Attention Tear Us Apart and Jenny Odell‘s How To Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy. Both writers figured it all out before I did, and their words have done much to help me try and plot out what path I’d take to unwind the damage I’d already done to myself.

It took a while, but I’ve started to make some adjustments to my life that are already paying dividends in the form of more time, less aggravation, better concentration and, honestly, a schadenfreude-esque sense of “JOMO” – the joy of missing out. But nothing changes until some significant number of us change. So here’s what happens to be working for me.

Start with the smartphone. Maybe you don’t need one?

This is my new phone. It’s the only “dumbphone” that my carrier T-Mobile offers. It was a mere $99 to buy it full-stop, then another $20/month to add it to my family plan. It has an internet browser (though you’ll only want to use it in something approximating an informational emergency); unlimited talking and texting; the ability to take, send and receive photos; and Google Maps – the single most useful app that the internet every produced.

I still have to hold onto my old smartphone due to work; our 2-factor authentication and all that – as well as the fact that I happen to work for a mobile technology company. But that one is now my secondary phone, the one lying on a counter in a distant room, and brought out as needed for work. The dumbphone is the phone, and aside from re-adjusting to the triple-tap texting I did in the early 2000s, I’m perfectly happy with forgoing the dopamine and turning that need for stimulation to some physical media instead, like a print magazine or a book.

Anything you can do on a computer or a smartphone, do it on the computer.

This is more to put in small, deliberate barriers that keep you from being totally ensnared on your device. You can go full dumbphone, but if you can’t (yet), at least head back to 2005-style internet usage and call up what you want to see on a laptop or desktop computer, rather than gratuitously reaching for the smartphone. It’s all still there, except maybe some of the social apps that I don’t use. To that end….

Get off social media.

This has been harder than I expected (update 10/5/25: actually it was easier than I thought). I like to create things, like this blog and this fanzine, and when I do things like that, I want to use the communications mechanisms that virtually everyone settled into the past twenty years to promote them – because that’s where the people are. When my wife passed away this year, after a short period I talked about it on Facebook and Instagram, and posted some fantastic photos of her through the years. People were supportive and loving and amazing.

So slinking away from those sites is a little tough. (Update 10/5/25: again, actually no it wasn’t). Twitter/X was not tough at all – that place is absolutely toxic and disgusting, and I quit years ago, pre-Musk. TikTok and the others, I don’t know, as I’m not interested. I know what they do to kids of my son’s generation, because I’ve watched the dopamine frenzy they engender, probably best exemplified by crosswalks full of zombies glued to their devices – one of the most depressing science fiction-esque emblems of our time as there is. Or perhaps try to go to a movie at a “cineplex” in 2025 and sit next to someone who doesn’t bring his or her phone out multiple times per film – I’ve been failing at this of late, and it’s heartbreaking for all of us.

For now, I’m keeping my two social sites and checking them each once per morning, although even this is leveling off (update 10/5/25 again – it’s leveled off in full – they gone!). Have you seen just how awful they are now? Instagram actually leads with two advertisements, followed by something you want to see, followed by another ad. Why bother? I reserve the right to post on these still, at least when I have something to promote, but for the most part I’d like to evolve to a point where I actually look at them twice a month year, maybe.

Practice “slow news”.

This one also requires a bit of willpower and possibly an outlay of money as well, but hear me out. I’d noticed just how pointless my rapacious news consumption was, and how it mostly just depressed me while also keeping me hooked into a screen. We’d subscribed to the print edition of the Friday/Saturday/Sunday NY Times for years, and I recently started just waiting around for those to really dig in deep to the world’s events over the weekend, and just checking headlines a couple times a day otherwise.

This was so freeing and helpful that I’ve now upped the game and subscribed to the print edition of the paper every day of the week. This will keep me off of my iPad and laptop, even, and I can open the paper each night like a dad in his armchair and seek to understand, rather than skim. Replace with your own favorite paper as necessary. I also supplement this with print subscriptions to The Atlantic, Sight and Sound, The Hockey News and New York magazines, as well as a series of Substack newsletters that come into my email inbox, and can be read at leisure. That’s me – like I said, your publications will vary. The point is that news doesn’t have to be fast and instantaneous; we’ve been conditioned by the internet to think so, of course, but just try to go slooooow news for a few days, then ask yourself if you really missed anything.

Avoid AI entirely with print books.

As enshittified as the internet has become in recent years, it is soon to collapse under its own weight as tech companies seek to monetize the absurd amounts of money they’ve spent on data centers and AI projects by moving everything to AI-driven slop. Silicon Valley, finding that it wasn’t able to easily innovate any longer and that it couldn’t create products and services that people actually wanted, are now force-feeding us something we don’t want, don’t need and didn’t ask for. It may be keeping the tax base of my city of San Francisco humming, which is great for the value of my house (for now), but it’s killing everything else – just ask a college professor, a journalist or some moron talking to ChatGPT like it’s his therapist.

This is the time to go back to books, real paper books with ideas and stories and empathy-enhancing characters. I’m reading more in 2023-2025 than I have in years, and I’m seeing my attention span finally snapped back to what it once was, where I can knock out 70-100 pages of a novel in a single sitting without any digital interruptions at all. It’s the best. AI can’t touch it, and there’s no slop to be seen anywhere.


So anyway, that’s what seems to be enabling me to further my own happiness and ensure I’m not too complicit in our collective downfall. Even writing this essay out and publishing it is a little “performative”, I’ll freely admit – something the internet surely taught me to do. Yet I think sharing my “plan” is a step toward hopefully encouraging others to take similar steps as well, not merely for their own betterment but as a cudgel to eventually turn the tide and help us get an internet built around people and their needs, not venture capitalists and theirs.

Grappling With Grief and Attempting a Public Catharsis

The two of us in 1994.

My wife Rebecca died this year. Just over four months ago, to be exact. She and I had been together for more than half our respective lives, having started a whirlwind courtship in 1994 that moved very rapidly into coupledom, then into living together and then marriage four years later. While her death was something that I ultimately saw coming, given the severe regression of her health the previous couple of years, it’s those final months that I spend the most time ruminating over, and in particular, the final two months, from February to April 2025. These were months spent trying to pull her back from the abyss; in trying to convince ourselves that it was possible; and in grasping in futility any evidence that supported positivity of any kind. 

Of course I think about the rest of our 31 years together all the time, most of which Rebecca spent healthy and strong. We created a now-22-years-old son whom we love and loved; we traveled everywhere; and she worked a variety of careers during that time, including as a social worker, an after-school science teacher and as a bending, twisting, long-posing yoga instructor for both adults and children.

Yet my brain can’t seem to let go of her end, those last two months.

I think about these months and I feel them so viscerally. They are intense, and they pull up emotional turbulence from me that ranges from congratulatory, back-patting self-satisfaction (for having been a great caretaker and for having been verbally acknowledged as such over and over by my dying wife) to regret (for not having been even more devoted to her in her final days) to guilt

For some reason, I have this intense need to catalog these months, to put them accurately on the record, and to attempt to not forget a single detail. I think it’s because the rest of our life together was often lived publicly, and in concert with others – in the sense that the many happy parts were shared widely, and were documented in photographs, social media posts and verbally, in places well beyond the confines of our home. Her final two months were not shared, except with me.

It all started when Rebecca had a tumor removed from her chest way back in 2002 to help combat an autoimmune disease she’d been suffering from called myasthenia gravis. Ultimately, this extraction was successful, and she went into full remission within a year of giving birth to our son in 2003. For ten years, we never discussed this removed tumor as “cancerous”, either with her doctors or between the two of us, and yet that’s exactly what it was. Its remnants showed up on a scan in 2012, leading to two surgeries and an intense round of chemotherapy. Hair loss, sickness, the whole deal – and yet by 2014, and for the following eight years, the marginally remaining cancer was just a slowly-ticking phantom that showed up on scans but barely budged each year. 

It certainly didn’t affect her daily vigor. On the contrary, she worked out and lifted weights, she raised our son, she aggressively pursued new hobbies, made new friends, and far more. It was what you’d call a normal life, albeit one that lived with a dangerous, hard-to-track specter. All of a sudden, it began sending haywire and hard-to-decipher signals across her organs and systems in 2022.

Rather than spreading and multiplying as cancers typically do, Rebecca’s instead wreaked havoc during her final three years on her lungs, her digestive system, her blood and, of course, her ability to live life to the fullest the way she had been. Doctors, especially at first, treated each issue individually and not systemically, something that impressed upon me repeatedly just how little we often still know about disease and illness in 2025, despite everyone’s best intentions and extensive training. 

Rebecca in her forties.

Coming right after Covid, we had to be extremely careful to make sure that she, an immunocompromised adult, didn’t get it. Ironically, when she did, her symptoms ended up being no worse than anyone else’s. She kept up regularly with friends and showed immense love and care for both myself and our son, and only really slowed down significantly in 2024 after a January hospitalization, and then particularly in 2025, tipping over into those final two months that we didn’t know were the final two months.

I have extensively documented for myself, and very deliberately for no one else, how we managed during the time between when she was released from a two-week stint at UCSF Hospital in late February 2025 to her death in April. I was very much on duty during this time, working full-time from home for my work – which is a remote job anyway – while also serving as Rebecca’s cook, her driver to appointments, her daily outdoor walking and then wheelchair-pushing partner; her administrator of increasingly complex daily medicines, including intravenously; and of course her husband and best friend. Even in her final seven days – when I’d finally admitted that she might not make it through the end of the year – there were tests and readings and hopeful signs that we held up together as evidence that she could improve, that she might rebound.

I regret, with the benefit of sad hindsight that fills my eyes with tears every time I think about it, that I didn’t drop everything at all times to just be with her. This regret bleeds over into guilt. This guilt can be intense in brief moments, and it takes many forms. Most often it is thankfully quickly leavened by the rational knowledge that any behavior I might feel guilty for was normal and explainable behavior in the moment. For instance, I too often brought up that I needed eventually to go to Oregon to help my 81-year-old father, who’d recently suffered a stroke. We talked about ways that this could happen, knowing that it really couldn’t. Same with a business trip to Chicago, where my company is located, for “face time” that I hadn’t been able to have for the previous 14 months, and got nervous about due to having been laid off from previous jobs. I even hoomphed a couple times about the timing of her daily walk if it didn’t line up with other ridiculous priorities of my own, such as getting my own exercise, or some inane work meeting I almost definitely could have easily rescheduled. 

There’s also the guilt that comes from knowing, after the fact, that she would die from an inability to breathe, and for not concentrating anything and everything on fighting just that part of her illness alone. Alas, she was fighting a multi-front battle. I do wonder if delaying her death would have also meant deepening her suffering. I always said to her how I would do anything to keep her from suffering and from pain. All things considered and relatively speaking, both suffering and pain were minimal, and I know that my care had a lot to do with this. Although that’s all very easy for me to say on both counts.

What would my coping and grieving process be like under different death-of-spouse circumstances, I wonder sometimes? How does the abrupt, accidental death of a healthy spouse, a woman in the prime of life, hit for the surviving spouse in the months and years following? There are certainly plenty of people to ask. I suspect – and I think quite rightly – that it’s far worse than what I’ve gone through. In the grand scheme of things, it would have been far worse for Rebecca as well.  

What about a long, slow, eminently foreseeable decline? The “you’ve got five years to live” diagnosis. The “you’ve got cancer, and there’s nothing we can do” diagnosis. Rebecca did not have this. At times we were frustrated that she didn’t have this, if you can understand the sentiment. Her final two years were more a purgatory of waiting for the scales to tip one way or the other, even if, in retrospect, she was very much headed to her death in a relatively linear fashion. We just didn’t know it for certain, and I don’t think the doctors did either.

Rebecca at 28, a year after we started going out.

Mentally, she had shouldered an enormous load for over three years, and given that cancer diagnosis and chemotherapy back in 2012, even longer besides. So when she lapsed into “anxiety” after being sent home from the hospital at the end of February, no one on either her medical team nor in her personal life batted an eyelash. Of course you’re anxious, honey. Post- traumatic stress. The accumulation of everything you’ve gone through. She was given drugs to help with this, and they did very little. This is because her shortness of breath – from “anxiety” – ended up being the end result of the cancer doing its mysterious work in her lungs, messing up her passageways with a disease called bronchiectasis, and then the hammer blow of pneumonia on top of this that she was unable to survive. Not anxiety. It really hurts to know this.

Yet would you believe that six days before her death, she attended and participated in an online film studies discussion class that she loved? Or that five days before her death, she and I watched the White Lotus season three finale? Or, going back eight days before her death, I wheeled her around Golden Gate Park’s flower arboretum? I’m under no illusions that these were entirely comfortable things for her given what she was dealing with. They were not, and yet she still found joy or moments of peace in her final days. 

I think I just can’t truly grapple with a death like hers, not merely because she was mine, but because she was just here, you know? It’s why the final months play on a loop in my brain, and frankly, I want them to. I want the intensity of this feeling. I don’t want it to flatten out when I think about her. I want to feel the injustice and the tragedy of it all, while also navigating my way through and eventually out of intense grieving. 

2024, only six months before her death.

If you’re wondering, I’m mostly doing well. Seriously. I know that grief spills out in different ways, and mine just spilled out into this thing you’re reading. It’s a catharsis of a kind. I am in no way against therapy or support groups, nor do I find myself “above” them in any way. But weirdly, I find that typing words on pages is the single best way for me to grapple, the thing that helps me the most. I also know that grief is non-linear and moves in stages, and therefore I am open to whatever form it will take and whatever intervention, self-driven or otherwise, I’ll need. Perhaps her final months will flatten out into an overall composite picture of her, and of us together. Perhaps I won’t need that intensity of feeling any longer, and I can come to see her final two months merely as my least favorite out of the 370 months we spent together.

The Idiot’s Quest

You’ve heard of the Hero’s Journey, or the Hero’s Quest – an archetype of storytelling as ancient as it is overplayed in literature, film and even in modern consumer product marketing. A more right-sized version for me would be to chase a pursuit so inconsequential, so self-referential, so utterly useless -and then to write about it on the internet, even before it’s happened. This is where we are today, on August 19th, 2025, as I embark on an attempt to walk every street in San Francisco, California, merely for the ability to have said that I’ve done it. That, and perhaps the friends I’ll make along the way.

It’s not like I came up with this idea on my own, but it’s one I’ve nursed for a couple of years. I remember telling my late wife about this idea at one point, only to be halfway met with the I’m-actually-barely-listening rejoinder of “that would be so silly”. But people totally do it! And not just in San Francisco, either. This is a thing in New York City, Seattle, London and elsewhere.

It never really happened before with me because, yeah, she was right – it is pretty silly, but also because I’ve been so wedded to running the past 25 years that any time I’ve gotten myself to exercise, I have spent it repeatedly running one of my two six-mile routes in San Francisco, ad nauseam. And because while she was ill, at times gravely so, the past three years, I had been taking close care of her while also working my 9-to-5 job and partaking in innumerable hobbies and pursuits. Who has time for walking? Well sure, I’ve written about some of my walking on this site before, so those various Crosstown Trails undoubtedly whetted my appetite for something even more obsessive.

The running, alas, seems to have hit a bit of a dead end at age 57, it seems. The aches come quicker, the miles are tougher, the minor injuries last longer. The spirit is willing, the flesh may not be. I went running this past June one day, and then on to a baseball game in Sacramento the next, and I was in such staggering pain going down the aisles of the stadium there that I surely appeared to be 117 years old and/or having a stroke. Walking? Walking is no problem. I can put in the miles, let me tell you. And I had better do so, lest my lack of regular running allow my twin obsessions of a morning bagel and the odd craft beer catch up with me and add onto the “spare tire” that begins inflating of its own accord without consistent aerobic exercise (and thankfully deflates just as regularly with it).

So be it, then. I don’t want to just set out on some dumbass random walk like I did repeatedly all over southern San Francisco during the most meaningless days of the pandemic. Let there be a purpose, something to be measured and counted – to be gamified, to use a term of our time. I may not live in San Francisco forever, nor will I live forever, so now’s the time. I’m publicly committing to walking each street of my city, starting with the loop I did yesterday (pictured), doing so in configurations and at dates and times of my choosing, and then not calling it done until it’s truly done. From the halls of the Sunnydale Housing Project to the shores of Fort Point, I will tread across the full length of any and all named streets, even if it’s named Colon or Myron or Beaver or Dirk Dirkson Place. I’ll provide an update in this space once it’s completed. Of course I will.

KFJC, April Fool’s Day and the “Month of Mayhem”

I spent large chunks of my junior high and high school experience circa 1981-85 alone in my bedroom, awash in the sounds of an life-changing college radio station from Los Altos Hills, California called KFJC coming out of my clock radio. I had previously been a young music freak who tuned into America’s Top 40 every Sunday, as well as a budding “new waver” discovering DevoThe B-52s and Adam and the Ants; and to some extent, I remained (and possibly still remain) something of a new waver. Through KFJC, and definitely through KPFA’s “Maximum Rock and Roll Radio Show” on Tuesday nights, I discovered punk rock, which was then in the throes of branching into its full-on, light-speed hardcore phase. I bathed in English DIY and dark/gothy stuff, and some early favorites of mine were Siouxsie & The BansheesBauhausThe Delta 5 and the Au Pairs. This station helped turn me from a music fan into a raging music obsessive, and to think that I’d be joining my DJ idols there in a few years was totally unfathomable at the time.

Yet it happened. After four years spent DJ-ing in college at KCSB in Santa Barbara, I moved back to the San Francisco Bay Area in 1989 with enough confidence in my chops, such as they were, to approach my formative heroes at KFJC with a proposal for my own show. It wasn’t that difficult – after a mere few weeks of toil in the 2-6am time slot, I landed first a decent morning show, and then a fantastic Monday night gig from 6-10pm.

KFJC was among the most creative of radio stations, drawing upon yearly traditions that had been started by long-retired DJs. Two of their best traditions, both of which continue to this day (!), are the annual “format change” on April Fool’s Day and the subsequent “Month of Mayhem”, where DJs put together hours-long overviews of particular artists, neglected genres of music, and all manner of musical ephemera, strung together in a manner not conducive for a typical radio slot.

April Fool’s was always a blast, and I remember being a stung listener several times during my teenage years when I’d forgotten what day it was. There was the time that the format change was reduced to a rotation of only six songs, played back-to-back in sets, then started over again – an exaggerated version of some awful Top 40 station programmed by a corporation. Except that the two songs I remember from this particular day of mirth were pretty cool – “Start!” by The Jam and “Watching The Detectives” by Elvis Costello – placing it around 1982 or so. There was another time where the format changed to all reggae, and all the DJs talked in a bogus Jamaican patois. Somewhat more recently, KFJC switched frequencies with New Jersey’s WFMU for the day, which must have been absolutely baffling for listeners on both coasts.

In my own brief time at KFJC from 1989-1990, I got in on one April Fool’s day. We decided to change the station’s format on 4/1/1990 to an “oldies” station, except the oldies here would be alternative/college rock songs that were no more than ten years old. I got a key slot on Sunday night from 6-9pm this particular day, taking the place of a radical left/conspiracy theory show hosted by a guy named Dave Emory. (I believe this show was later syndicated, though Emory worked out of our Los Altos Hills studio). I totally hammed up the format, announcing in my most weasel-like of milquetoast DJ voices after a song would end, “Ohhhh yeah, don’t that just make you feel so GOOD hearing that again? Going allllllllllll the way back to 1984, that was a real golden classic from the Meat Puppets”.

Then I’d do a fake “traffic report”, where I’d spin a sound effects record of a helicopter in the air and then play a pre-recorded tape we’d made of some phony, deliberately wrong traffic update. It would start off talking about local freeways (“problems in the MacArthur Maze, heavy backup at the Bay Bridge, metering lights are on”), and then would segue matter-of-factly into Los Angeles freeways that were seven hours away from us (“Injury-accident on the 405”) – keeping in mind, of course, that it was Sunday night at 7pm and there was likely no one on any freeways.

The best part of this particular prank was that I got to make up new time slots for all the popular DJs our new format was displacing. I acted like this was now my new slot, and that these were the songs I was going to play every week in this slot. I then would announce stuff in my stupid hack DJ voice like, “Don’t worry, Dave Emory fans, Dave’s still got a home on KFJC. You can now catch his show each and every Sunday morning from 4:45-5am, only here on ‘The Wave of The West’”. I invented new slots for every show that day, all at preposterous times like 1:30-2am and the like – and then the calls started coming in. The lines just lit up like a Christmas tree after the “Emory time slot change”. And then I realized how unhinged some of Emory’s listeners were. They called me one after the other, totally freaked out, asking for clarification, begging KFJC to reconsider, completely not in on the joke.

This went on for about an hour before I got a call from Emory himself, who told me I needed to cut it out for my own safety – “You don’t know how dangerous some of these people can be – they’ll come down to the station”. Based on my previous calls that hour from conspiracy-engaged types (the big controversies/obsessions of the day were Reagan’s “October Surprise” and still, 27 years later, JFK’s assassination). I decided he was probably right, and cut this part of my shtick as my show was winding down. Of course, the station reverted to its normal free-form format the next morning, and all was well again.

I also only got one “Month of Mayhem” special in, because I quit the station in July 1990, fed up with the depressed, insular frathouse of lost souls that seemed to make up station personnel. Oh – that, and the commute from my new apartment in San Francisco. Yet I did get to do a three-hour special on THE FLESH EATERS, no mean feat when the band only put out four forty-minute albums in the 1980s and one single in 1978, and whom I never saw live and only heard for the first time a year after they’d broken up. My four years in college in the late 80s, however, had turned me into a rabid, posthumously worshipping fan of the band and their genius singer, Chris Desjardins, who I was by then seeing play in his new bands The Divine Horsemen and Stone By Stone.

At that point in my life The Flesh Eaters were easily “my favorite band of all time”. When I conceived of doing this special back in March 1990, I wrote a letter to Chris D (we didn’t have email back then, kids) and asked him if I could interview him on the show. I gave him my work phone number so we could work out the details (we didn’t have cell phones back then, kids). Well, two months went by and I’d heard nothing from him, and figured that the lack of interest from him was in keeping with his publicity-shy, disinterested persona.

One hour before I was to leave my job at Monster Cable and drive down to KFJC and do the special, I got a call on my work line, and whoa – it was Chris D himself. He’d love to do an interview. Uhhh…..OK. So I hustled down to the station, corralled an engineer to help me figure out how to patch him in, took Chris’s call live on the air, and proceeded to do what I remember as the most botched, hurried, unprepared, nervous interview I’ve ever done – with my idol, no less. And of course – I didn’t tape it, so there’s no historical record for me to check and assure myself that “it wasn’t so bad after all”. In my mind it was a friggin’ disaster – but Chris did break the news on our call that he was re-forming the Flesh Eaters that year, which was totally exciting until I realized that all it meant was that he had a new band put together, and he just slapped on his old, more reknown band’s name on top of it. (As it turned out, this new Flesh Eaters were actually really good for a few years, and played live and recorded albums up into the 21st Century).

When I quit the station in shame and disgust on July 4th, 1990, I remember driving back to San Francisco, straight to a FLIPPER reunion show at the Covered Wagon Saloon, totally angry and bummed about the circumstances surrounding my decision. I drank fairly heavily at the club. That day I’d done my final show, and as it turned out, it was my final show anywhere as a behind-the-glass, guy with 2-3 turntables disk jockey. To this day I still have anxiety dreams where the song on Turntable 1 is about to end, and there’s nothing queued up on Turntable 2 – and gasp – we’re about to have some “dead air”!!!

I still love KFJC and the ethos behind KFJC, and there’s a whole new generation at the station now who are keeping it among America’s most vital musical institutions. Sometimes I still wish I was there, just so I could cook up more pranks and Month of Mayhem musical OCD specials – then I wonder if anyone even listens to the radio at all anymore. If anyone taped that May 14th, 1990 KFJC Flesh Eaters special – or the April 1st, 1990 6-9pm show – please do get in touch.

My Patty Hearst Obsession, In Photographs

September 1975 was an especially heady period for a precocious, jittery, news-obsessed nearly eight-year-old in Sacramento, CA. Right there in my hometown, we had a big-deal assassination attempt on President Gerald Ford by a member of the Manson family; this was followed in the next two weeks by a second assassination attempt on the president in nearby San Francisco, and then, also in San Francisco, we learned of the surprise apprehension of FBI-most-wanted-criminal Patty Hearst, the culmination of one the strangest and most compelling spectacles of the 1970s.

This jarring news played out on nearly successive covers of TIME magazine that month, interspersed with a cover story on the racist busing battle taking place in Boston at the start of that school year. I read it all gleefully and cover-to-cover, over and over again. While I myself was just beginning the 3rd grade, my parents had benevolently allowed me to marinate and pickle myself in the era’s America-coming-undone news, which was playing out in our weekly delivery of Time; the nightly 6pm national news; and gravely-intoned 24/7 news reports on KCRA radio of happenings around the world – hijackings, wars, bombings and New York City bankruptcies – that provided an ever-present ambiance to cross-town car trips to baseball practice, the library and Herfy’s Hamburgers in our Ford Pinto. 

It was the Patty Hearst kidnapping, bank robbery and eventual SLA immolation in Los Angeles that captivated me the most. The brazen snatching of the wide-eyed, rich, innocent heiress from Berkeley and her gradual absorption into the Symbionese Liberation Army’s cockeyed schemes of revolution was and remains totally fascinating, even then to a 7-year-old who could only skim the surface of what was really going on. Their multi-headed cobra logo was extremely cool. I knew at the time that their pseudo-overthrow of the establishment was taking place near us, if not in Sacramento proper then only 90 minutes “down the road” in San Francisco. I remember clearly news reports of the robbery of the Hibernia Bank at 1450 Noriega in SF’s Sunset District in April 1974 – the one in which Patty Hearst, now “Tania” and a full-fledged member of the SLA, menacingly stood guard with a gun. The shock of silver-spooned Patty Hearst, whether willingly or unwillingly, enlisted into the services of the batshit-crazy SLA was palpable, and was a frequent subject of discussion among parents, news anchors and Time Magazine pundits over the course of that next year.

It was the terrifying end of the SLA the following month that I remember the most clearly, the May 1974 shootout and fire in Los Angeles that killed six members of the group. We listened to it taking place on the news – to this very day I can remember the story “breaking” into music programming of whatever radio station my mom was listening to in the car, and then breathlessly following regular updates of the gun battle and engulfing, organization-ending fire that followed. 

I know it all sounds implausible that a 6½ year old kid claims to have not only followed but to have moderately understood even a fraction of what was going on with the SLA and Hearst. While I can reasonably assume that my sociopolitical sentience only went so far at that age, I truly did hoover up each issue of Time and every news broadcast, so much so that I’d intermittently be brought out amongst my parents’ friends to rap about the news or to count down my memorized American Top 40, usually as a sort of parlor trick that I of course was only too delighted to partake in, to the oohs and aahs of the assembled guests. 

All this American psychopathy was stamped upon me at this young age, and so when Jeffrey Toobin’s well-reviewed history of the Patty Hearst saga, American Heiress: The Wild Saga of the Kidnapping, Crimes and Trial of Patty Hearst came out in 2017, I devoured it and it in turn, at some level, devoured me. See, Toobin’s book was not merely thrilling and a terrific history of the saga and the times – which, forty years later, really placed the homegrown American left-wing revolutionaries as relics of a very different ethos and place – but it provided just about every street address where every act in the story went down. And most of these street addresses were located within a 5 mile radius of my San Francisco home. 

I did what any of you would have done – right? – and proceeded to “collect” photographs of each location as it stands today, much to the chagrin and dismay of my immediate family. This project was completed earlier this year, in 2022, when I accompanied my wife and son on their trip to Disneyland, but rather than share the joy of Disney with them, I basked in my own joy spent standing and ogling the exact site where 6 Symbionese Liberation Army members died in a violent revolutionary gun battle with the Los Angeles Police Department.

To wit – my photographs.

2603 Benvenue Avenue, Berkeley CA

Our story begins at 2603 Benvenue Avenue, Apt. #4, where Miss Hearst was kidnapped while a college student at UC-Berkeley and taken away by the SLA. Here’s what it looked like in 2018 when I visited. This is several blocks away from campus, in a typically lovely, leafy and ramshackle Berkeley neighborhood.

1827 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco

Here’s where the SLA took Patty after her kidnapping, to 1827 Golden Gate Avenue in a neighborhood somewhat bordering Pacific Heights now commonly called “NOPA” (North of Panhandle). My understanding is that this is the location that she spent the bulk of her captivity in.

1235 Masonic Avenue, San Francisco

I don’t know how the SLA thought they could then safely hide Patty out one half-block away from Haight Street, but one helpful site posits that “The SLA was able to hide in plain sight because the counterculture was prevalent in the area during that time”. This area is full of lovely Victorians both then and now, and the only whiffs of the counterculture are the omnipresent self-congratulatory murals, signs and t-shirt shops lauding the 1960s heyday of the place.

37 Northridge Drive, Daly City CA

Toobin’s book pinpoints this location as the place where Patty Hearst was locked in a closet and underwent most of her psychological torture, which then transformed her into the most famous exponent of “Stockholm Syndrome” of her day. It’s an unassuming home near a cliff overlooking the ocean in the outer reaches of Daly City, just south of San Francisco.

1450 Noriega Avenue, San Francisco

The former Hibernia Bank, the robbery of which by the SLA with Patty in tow really made this case a cause célèbre around the world.

288 Precita Avenue, San Francisco

This location in the Mission/Bernal Heights area was used as a safe house by SLA members Bill and Emily Harris in 1974 until they were arrested.

625 Morse Street, San Francisco

I think I was the most excited when I came upon this one. It’s where Patty was arrested, and the safe house that she was using up until 1975. The neighborhood was eerily quiet when I took this photo, and I had half a mind to knock on the door to see who was home and if they wanted to talk Hearst arcana with me. I wisely decided against it, but at least I took this snapshot.

1466 East 54th Street, Los Angeles

This was the culmination of my journeys, the house where the dream died. The house itself is gone now; as you see, the canopy in the driveway to the right of 1464 East 54th Street is where the destroyed house once stood; to the right of that stands 1468 East 54th. When I visited, I had to deduce that the house was no longer there, as I’d thought it had likely been rebuilt.

If you want to watch what happened there on May 17th, 1974, this is a good video to watch. And if you really want to experience the psychological weirdness of those times, I recommend not only the Toobin book but Death To The Fascist Insect, a collection of communiques and writings by the SLA during their underground terrorist peak. It’s a wonder that most of us who marinated in all of this at a young age seemingly made it out okay.

The Time Kurt Cobain Partied With Me at My House

Kurt Cobain partied with me at my house. 

There, now please don’t ever accuse me of “burying the lede”. It’s actually a tale of little consequence nor much entertainment value, yet it’s also one I’ve fitfully used as an answer in organized “icebreakers” with co-workers for nearly thirty years – i.e., “What’s one thing that might be surprising about you?”. Or perhaps it’s just magically come up in conversation, I don’t know.

Invariably my story is met with incredulity, or shock, or wonder. “You?” is usually the first response, as in, “Why would this have happened to you?”. This is because Kurt Cobain occupies for current generations the sort of legendary/untouchable status that Jim Morrison did in mine – someone now dead from before your time whose music and vision and lyrics and overall bearing touched the world (or whatever). Let me be the first to say: we couldn’t have known it at the time.

Actually, my in-person and otherwise interactions with Nirvana, the band, began during my senior year of college at UC-Santa Barbara. I had a show on our college radio station KCSB and also helped out in other ways, and as a consequence found myself on the phone talking to Jonathan Poneman, one of the founders of Sub Pop records. The label was just beginning a new subscription-only mail-order singles club, and he told me to get ready to get excited about the first one in the series to come out later in 1988, from a new Washington State band called “Nirvana”. He said they were “a cross between Black Sabbath and Cheap Trick”, which sounded just awful to me. Thankfully the single that would eventually arrive in my mailbox, “Love Buzz / Big Cheese”, was marginally better than that. When I eventually sold it via a Flipside Magazine classified ad around 1993 for a whopping $75 – a year before Cobain’s death – I felt like a shrewd, record-trading Rockefeller. (The numbered, limited-edition single now routinely goes for $5,000+ and is easily one of the most collectable records of its era).

Not long after this time, in May 1989, the former hardcore punk band Scream came to KCSB and were slotted to play a live show on my Wednesday night 8-10pm radio program. Santa Barbara is a perfect gig-less Wednesday night pit stop between early-week gigs in the San Francisco Bay Area and weekend gigs in Los Angeles/Orange County/San Diego, or vice-versa. I was always happy to receive some touring band on my show because our music director, Eric Stone, had exceptional taste in punk rock and its offshoots, and even if he brought in some middling band like Scream it was still a feather in my cap that a band we’d heard of and sometimes liked was playing within the walls of our beloved radio station, and on my show, no less.

Scream were by this time sort of a grunge/emo hybrid, before either term was in heavy rotation, and I know that they counted among their members at least two former and current intravenous drug users, because one of the members told me so. That member was Dave Grohl, the fresh-faced 20-year-old drummer of the band, easily the most likable and extroverted visitor to our studio that day. While other Scream members sniffed & snorted and argued with other, Grohl came into the DJ booth when I was back-announcing records and hung out & talked music with me, then consented to a brief on-air interview during which he cracked jokes & made mirth that I unfortunately remember none of the particulars of. I don’t believe a tape of this encounter exists, but with god as my witness, it happened. 

As you may be aware, Grohl would, within 2 years be recruited to drum for Nirvana on their path to becoming one of the biggest bands of all time; become incredibly rich; form the Foo Fighters and become even more incredibly rich; and so on. I saw a book written by him at the airport just three weeks ago.

I recognize that none of this tells you anything about the time Kurt Cobain partied at my house. Hey, just like any good icebreaker, you’ll need to wait! Actually we’ve nearly arrived at that part. So Nirvana, the ones who put out that mediocre 45 I sold for a mere fraction of its eventual immense worth, would then put out a 1989 LP called Bleach that I liked better. The band was part of a great whoosh of heavy, punk-influenced Seattle-area bands releasing music that year, often on Sub Pop and/or on similar labels, catching all sorts of buzz and all seemingly touring up and down California during the year 1989.

Chris Novoselic from Nirvana at Marsugi’s, San Jose CA 2/11/89

I was visiting my parents in San Jose toward the end of my time in college, and it just so happened that my no-question absolute favorite of these heavy bands, Mudhoney, were playing at Marsugi’s in San Jose that weekend on February 11th, 1989, with their openers Vomit Launch and Nirvana. Yes, a then- four-piece Nirvana, playing a 150-person club, themselves opening for Chico, California’s Vomit Launch before Mudhoney went on. I recall enjoying their set, which ended with Cobain deliberately tumbling backwards on stage, into the drum kit, scattering equipment everywhere as feedback squalled and the 35 or so people who’d arrived to that point hooted their appreciation for his showmanship. Over two years later, on June 13th, 1991, I’d also see a now 3-piece Nirvana, with Grohl, open for Dinosaur Jr. at The Warfield in San Francisco. It was the first and only time I’d see them in this form. They were still an indie band, still “one of ours”, I guess, but decidedly more popular than before thanks to a strong overall reception for Bleach, and about to become the biggest band in the world in 6 months.

Yet it was earlier in 1991, January if I’ve got my timing right, when my friend Bob, who happened to also be Mudhoney’s manager and jack-of-all-trades (merch seller, check writer, tour helper etc.), was visiting from Seattle and staying at my apartment at 941 Stanyan in the Haight-Ashbury neighborhood. We had plans to get some food on nearby Haight Street and then eventually walk over to the I-Beam Club that night, where The Melvins were playing. I wasn’t really a fan of that particular band, but it was a night out, and, as I’m sure you’d agree, sometimes you need a night out.

After we ate, we walked by a Thai restaurant and Bob spied Kurt and Chris from Nirvana coming out of it. There was a nice what-are-you-doing-here reunion between the three of them. It turned out that the Nirvana guys were driving back from Los Angeles to Seattle; perhaps, at least as I imagined it in hindsight, they had just signed their deal with DGC for Nevermind and were heading back home to figure it all out. They had plans to stay with a friend that night in San Francisco before starting for home the next morning.

Once we confirmed that they, too, were going to see The Melvins that night, Bob promptly invited the two of them over to my place for the pre-show drinks. The four of us walked across the street to Cala Market for liquid fortification, and I recall us bantering aimlessly until Cobain theatrically dropped a giant bottle of vodka on the checkout line belt and confidently proclaimed, “I want to have a hangover tomorrow”. To be honest, it’s the only thing I remember him saying of any consequence the entire night.

We then hoofed it back to my place and my room, whereupon the scene was set: Kurt Cobain sat quietly on my bed, drinking and not interacting much with the other three of us. He found much pleasure reading my Zippy The Pinhead comic anthologies, and immersed himself in those. Chris animatedly rifled through my record collection, getting super-excited when he’d pull something out he liked: “Oh! You have this Half Japanese record! Let’s play it!”. Bob, Chris and I talked loudly a bunch about music, while Kurt retreated quietly but respectfully in his corner of the room, not really getting into it with the rest of us at all.

We probably pre-partied for about an hour, three of us with our beers and Kurt with his bottle of vodka and a chaser, before we walked over to the I-Beam together. On the way over, I remember asking some dumb-ass question about their touring or their next record or something similarly sycophantic, and getting kind of a blow-off non-answer from Kurt, who clearly didn’t want to talk about his band at all. Once safely inside the club, we split up, and I didn’t see the two Nirvana guys again that night.

So this legendary night of Kurt Cobain partying at my house, the one I’ve used to grease the wheels of social interactions when called upon to do so, was about as inconsequential as any other night in my early 20s spent having a few drinks with various yahoos before seeing a band at a club. It just happened to be with a guy who’s now so posthumously world-famous that he’d be headlining Coachella or Glastonbury as a hologram right now if his bandmates had enough lack of integrity to allow it. 

There’s a postscript to this mediocre story as well. Only three weeks later, I went to see The Dwarves at The Stone, a club on Broadway in San Francisco. I immediately spied the insanely tall, aforementioned Nirvana bass player Chris Novoselic, with whom I shared much mirth and alcohol not even a month earlier. I bounded up to him while he was mid-conversation with someone and excitedly asked, “Hey Chris, remember me?”. He squinted his eyes, looked me over, and said with much finitude and no small amount of emphasis: ”NO”. 

Navigating Normalcy and Baseball Mania in a Global Pandemic

(I wrote this piece in December 2020, then forgot about it. At one point, pre-vaccines and in the depths of the pandemic, I had planned on taking a page from the book of Zisk and publishing an irreverent fanzine about baseball. It never happened. Today, I realized I’d completed this piece, and reckoned it shouldn’t just sit in Google Docs & should instead serve as the proverbial time capsule. Perhaps you too had these spikes of mania during 2020, and can relate in some manner.)

I’ve found as I’ve grown older that my baseball obsessions, and my desire to follow the sport closely, actually ramp up in the offseason, as opposed to, you know, when the games themselves are actually happening. The absence of a maelstrom of 10-15 games to track every single day, along with the lack of quantitative confusion that rapidly-accumulating baseball statistics bring, probably provides me with the mental space and calm to actually process all the things about the game that I enjoy so much. When the only thing going on is “the hot stove”, I’ve found, is the period in which I tend to read about, watch and contemplate the world of baseball the most.

The 2020 Covid-19 pandemic, therefore, predictably brought my lifelong baseball obsession to a raging, full-on boil – far more than I’d expected it to. It was my implicit reaction to something confounding and potentially deadly. Despite my better intentions, this baseball mania instantly displaced some of my more lofty, I-need-to-do-more-of-that passions, like watching arty films and reading more fiction – all of the aspirational, extracurricular things one might say they were going to do if presented with an unplanned stint at home. It probably had some connection to being teased to the very start point of the 2020 MLB season, through several weeks of pitchers & catchers, Spring Training games on the radio and so on – and then having it all cruelly yanked away by the fickle finger of fate, and by a deadly, once-in-a-hundred-years virus, sloppily and indifferently wished away and then bungled by the US federal government. More likely, it was an innate reversion on my part to something simple and uncomplicated; to a sport that has been a huge part of my life as long as I’ve been sentient enough to comprehend it, and that offers some level of comfort and normalcy even in the best of times.

The early pandemic, which of course rages on as I type this, begat a ramping-up of a number of strange baseball-related behaviors I’d only dabbled in over the years. I instantly switched out our cable TV subscription to ensure that we’d get the MLB Network – confusingly, at a time when no baseball at all was being broadcast. No matter. I hooked myself onto a series of documentary specials the network had built up over the years called “Baseball’s Seasons”, in which I’d revisit the pennant races of 1971, or 1965, or 1984, or 1997, and so on. In every hour, a champion. The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat. A circular narrative, unchanged every year, in which the rhythms of baseball produced a set of playoff teams, a World Series champion, two MVPs, two Cy Young Award winners, and two Rookies of the Year. Brainless comfort food in a world gone mad, or something like that.

MLB Network’s documentaries are the best thing about it, as far as I’m concerned. Their “MLB Network Presents” specials may tend toward the maudlin at times, but I truly watched some real corkers during lockdown, such as “The Cobra at Twilight” (Dave Parker, the 1979 “We Are Family” Pirates, and the man’s subsequent battle with Parkinson’s) and “Joy in Wrigleyville” (what it was like to be a lifelong Cubs fan when they won the 2016 Series). In April, I was laid off from my tech job, along with over 20% of the entire staff, as part of a relatively unnecessary Covid-19 panic by my company – and yes, of course that’s what I’d say. These two MLB Network shows were necessary salves at the end of long days spent massaging my resume, firing off emails, and waiting on hold to talk to California’s unemployment helpline.

In March, when lockdown truly was lockdown (our Mayor proclaimed for a few weeks that we couldn’t travel beyond a 5-mile radius of our homes), I rapidly added to a moderately-sized baseball card collection and was truly 11 years old again – a transparent return-to-the-womb coping mechanism if ever there was one. You can read about that process elsewhere in the magazine. Then, fearing that some of the more independent yet vital baseball-adjacent media organizations might be struggling to stay alive, I joined Fangraphs on a premium membership; plunked down for Society for American Baseball Research membership; and quickly hoovered up every back issue of Zisk fanzine that I didn’t already own. That last move was likely the linchpin to starting my own baseball-themed print fanzine, so who’s to say the pandemic didn’t have a few positive knock-on effects, right?

At one point, I not only had those many documentaries to watch at night, I would routinely alternate or complement them with some of the better recent baseball books, some of which are reviewed in these pages, rather than with the more highbrow fiction or nonfiction I’d intended to read. I belatedly discovered the books of Jason Turbow, then rapidly devoured them all. They made for excellent diversions as I hunted for work and read daily about the callous stupidity and grift coming from Washington, and the confounding sickness that waxed, waned and waxed again all over the world.

Then there was the great KBO enthusiasm bubble. I don’t know if you personally took part in this pandemic-induced tulipmania, yet when ESPN negotiated their 11th-hour contract to broadcast a season’s worth of Korean Baseball Organization’s games in May, I leapt right in and watched a few days’ worth of Tivo’ed games between teams with strange names like the NC Dinos and the Doosan Bears. It was part and parcel of missing the game, sure, but I also think there were many of us who revelled in an abstract schadenfreude. See, United States of Dumbasses, this is what you get when you take care of your citizenry and listen to scientists. You get live baseball, albeit without fans in the stands, and minus those Korean dance troupes that perform synchronized cheerleading moves. Baseball nonetheless!

My KBO fandom certainly didn’t last long, a casualty less of its uneven play and ballplayers whom I’d not heard of than of games that were already nearly a day old before I had the time or wherewithal to watch them. It was quite something to see when I did, however; especially watching Karl Ravetch and Eduardo Perez up late at night, trying to call games that were happening in another part of the world over Zoom, with them also each being in separate locales. Smooth and professional it was not, yet it was also the sort of dissociative spectacle I felt we all deserved at that point.

On that: as MLB season-resumption talks sputtered, then gathered steam, then sputtered again, there was a sense that I shared with more than a few armchair pundits that “we probably don’t deserve a baseball season”. I believe the popular phrase was, “Professional sports are the reward we get for having a functional society”. Well, we don’t have the latter even as I write this, despite the results of the 2020 presidential election, but we got the former many, many months ago anyway. I feigned total indifference when the MLB first returned, but I know I was pretty stoked to have it back, and I began watching Giants games when and where I could.

The 2020 season itself, as you know, was over and done with in a blur. I sat in my car listening to the radio in front of CVS on the last day of the regular season, as the Giants squandered their longshot chance to sneak into the expanded playoffs. In those two months they’d been better than they had any right to be, and none of it meant much of anything, given the small sample size. As it was happening, in August and September, I reverted to my aforementioned disengagement with the sport of baseball – “disengagement” relative to where I’d been in the previous months, not relative to the average human being. In other words, I worked in other pursuits. I got a new job. I stopped watching all those documentaries. I treated baseball as I do in any other season – as something to read about in the paper every morning, and which I’ll occasionally watch in full on TV or listen to on the radio. 

Then came the World Series, and I had to chide myself for not being all-in, given the fact that this was probably the single best Dodgers team since the mid-1970s, and an exciting Rays team built by mad scientists and quantum physicists with spare parts, duct tape and baling wire. I therefore decided to make the effort to watch every game, and indeed, I’m quite glad I did. As I settled in to watch Game 1 of a World Series featuring California and Florida teams playing the entire series in Texas, I had a profound sense of delight to actually see and hear fans in the stands – something I hadn’t even known was going to happen until I tuned in. They looked appropriately distanced, they were having loads of fun, and best of all, I heard their (real) cheers when someone popped a dinger or was struck out by one of the Rays and Dodgers’ interchangeable flamethrowers. It all felt very normal. It felt, at best, like it might be portending the end of this nightmare. To this day, I’ve yet to read any “I got Covid at Globe Life Field” stories, and believe me, I don’t want to read them.

Now it’s December 2020 as I write, and it’s clear that my pandemic baseball mania has lessened to such an extent that I’ve returned to a quite quote-unquote normal level of fandom. Keep in mind that all appearances to the contrary, I did not entirely ignore my family, nor my job search, not household improvements, nor some of my other passionately-engaged frivolous endeavors during this period. As I write this, I’m still happily married, my teenage son remains sane, I’m gainfully employed and we’ve even made a few minor updates to the home. I published a music fanzine (Dynamite Hemorrhage #8), created twice-monthly music podcasts and somehow found the time to go running 3x/week. Here I am writing this baseball fanzine, too. So totally, totally normal.

San Francisco’s ALTERNATIVE Crosstown Trail

The San Francisco Crosstown Trail is one of the city’s greatest ideas, up there with the Mission Burrito and stealing a baseball team from New York. I’ve walked the entire 17-mile length of it twice, and piece-parted my way through some of its better sections multiple times as well. A great deal of thinking and planning went into its creation, ensuring that as much green space as possible would be traversed, and that breathtaking vistas and outlooks would be maximized. Mission accomplished. It’s amazing.

And yet – now that you’ve done the Crosstown Trail – and if you haven’t, I hope you do – wouldn’t it be nice to know that an enterprising citizen has mapped out a different Crosstown Trail? An alternative Crosstown Trail, if you will?

Well what’s so different about it, I hear you sniggering. Let me tell you. First, let me say that, now that I’ve just walked the entire length of mine today (the one I planned online yesterday in about 90 minutes, using Google Maps), I will still cede superiority to the folks who spent months planning the original one. Theirs is demonstrably better – but, and I don’t say this lightly – it’s not light years better. Mine is a pretty damn good representation of San Francisco, and it is one hell of a workout.

Don’t follow this scrawl to the letter. Now that I’ve walked this, I’ve made some minor corrections.

First, mine goes from the northeast corner of the city, at Pier 39, to the southwest corner of the city – the beach at Fort Funston. Just below that beach, it’s Daly City, folks. If you can cross somewhat diagonally from from Pier 39 to Fort Funston, you’ve really covered some distance (15.5 miles!), and seen an incredible cross-section of San Francisco. The original Crosstown Trail goes southeast to northwest (or vice-versa if you do it the other way).

Because mine starts and remains in the most urban parts of San Francisco for much of its length, I’ve tried – as did the original – to maximize both green space and views as best I can. The only time it ever actually crosses the original southeast-to-northwest trail is for about a block or two way up in Golden Gate Heights (I think they share a small stretch on 14th Avenue). Whenever possible, I’ve tried to route the walker into a park, up a staircase, down a staircase, onto a trail and atop a vista. Having lived in San Francisco for 32 years now, I had the benefits of a little “local knowledge” that I laid on ya, but this trip showed me plenty of things I’d never seen before (like, who knew that the Mount Sutro hike behind UCSF was so peaceful and far up in the clouds that it felt like I was getting rained on up there? Who knew about Ina Coobraith Park? Not I).

This trip takes you into North Beach, Russian Hill, Pacific Heights, “NOPA”, the Haight (sort of), Cole Valley, the Inner Sunset, Golden Gate Heights, Parkside, the Sunset and Lake Merced – pretty much in that order.

You’ll see from my photos that it was an exceptionally foggy day today in San Francisco, from the top of the city to the bottom. Locals know: it’s always like this. Or at least it was in the summer of 2021.

Anyway, this is the Alternate Crosstown Trail across the city of San Francisco. I hope you try it – and that you can improve upon it (please leave a comment with any modifications you’ve made after walking it).

  • Start on The Embarcadero at Pier 39, right under the flags
  • Right on Kearney
  • Right on Bay
  • Left on Midway
  • Left on Francisco
  • Right on Grant
The view from Jack Early Park
  • Go 1 block on Grant, and you’ll make a left on Pfeiffer Street to go up the stairs to Jack Early Park
  • Then go back down to Grant Avenue and make a left
  • Left on Lombard – curves into Telegraph Hill Blvd.
  • Up stairs to Pioneer Park / Coit Tower
  • back out the other side; make a right on Filbert Street
  • Take the first stairs you see down to Filbert Street
  • Once you hit Washington Square Park, cut through it diagonally
  • Right on Union
  • Left on August Alley
  • Right on Green
  • Left on Mason
  • Right on Vallejo
  • Go up into Ina Coolbrith Park (amazing place)
  • At the top, make a left on Taylor (it looks like the park may continue on the other side of Taylor, but I was pretty tired from all the stairs at that point)
  • Right on Broadway (more stairs, but now you are walking on top of the Broadway Tunnel for quite a few blocks)
The view from Ina Coolbrith park. She was apparently “the first white baby” to come to San Francisco. How about that?
  • Left on Polk (stroll through Russian Hill; grab a drink from a bistro or something)
  • Right on Clay
  • After several blocks, Clay dead-ends right at the staircase into Lafayette Park
  • Come out opposite side, and make a right on Laguna (use the bathroom and refill your water bottle first)
  • Left on Washington. Now you’re going to see some pretty stunning homes.
  • After several blocks, Washington dead-ends into the Alta Plaza Park stairs. Go up those stairs
  • At the other side, go left on Scott
  • Right on Clay
  • After many blocks, left on Lyon
  • Once you hit Geary, you’ll need to make a right and go across a crosswalk; come back down Geary and make a right back onto Lyon
  • Left on Terra Vista
  • Right on Baker
  • Right on Turk (check out the Church of John Coltrane at 2097 Turk. I’ve lived here forever and had never known it was there)
  • Left on Lyon (so many great Victorians around here)
  • Cross through the Panhandle park, and get right back on Lyon
  • Lyon dead-ends at Buena Vista Park. Take the stairs up!
  • If you keep going up and to the right, you’ll end up at Upper Terrace Street. Make a right when you get there
  • Go on Upper Terrace for a while until you see a small stairway on your right. These are the Mt. Olympus Stairs. Take ’em!
  • Once you’re up there, you’ll see a large roundabout with an obelisk in the middle. Keep to the right, and you’ll continue on Upper Terrace
  • Take the “Monument Way Stairs” on your right
  • Right on 17th
  • Keep going on 17th until it dead-ends at Stanyan, then make a slight left on Stanyan
  • Immediately you’ll see a trailhead to your right. It’s not labeled as the “Historic Trail Trailhead”, but it is, and that’s what you want
  • Follow it for a looooong time through the woods until it comes to the West Ridge Trail sign, and then make a right onto the West Ridge Trail
  • Here’s a tip: the last 20 or so feet of the West Ridge Trail is really steep. It doesn’t even feel like a trail at all – just a hill you need to find your way down from. Be careful, OK?
You’ll be seeing a bunch of Victorians like this one
  • Left on Crestmont
  • Then – after less than a minute – a staircase appears to your right. Take it! This staircase goes on forever, but it’s all down, and for that you’ll be thankful
  • When it finally ends, right on Warren
  • Continue through 7th Avenue – Warren has now become Lawton
  • Left on 12th
  • When 12th hits Noriega, you’ll see a big wall in front of you; on the other side of that is a staircase called Selma that you’ll be taking. You just need to go right or left to get around the wall (I went right and made a U-turn)
  • Right on Ortega
  • Same thing here – you’ll want to take stairs up called “Cascade Walk” that you’ll see quickly, but you need to get around a wall first
  • Take Cascade Walk Stairs (tired yet?)
  • Takes you onto Funston Avenue; go straight
  • Right on Aerial Way (another stairway – down this time)
  • Left on 14th Avenue
  • Right on Mandalay (more steps going down)
  • Turns into Pacheco
  • Walk on Pacheco for a while, then make a left on 22nd Avenue
  • Right on Taraval
  • Left on 28th into Parkside Square Park (good bathroom/water station to your left)
Lake Merced
  • 28th basically hits a small wooded trail; go down it until you hit Wawona
  • Right on Wawona
  • Walk on Wawona for a while until you get to 39th Avenue
  • Left on 39th; cross Sloat Avenue
  • Slight right onto Skyline Blvd, which hugs Lake Merced
  • Walk on Skyline (left-hand side) for nearly a mile until you either start hearing guns going off (there’s a shooting range) or see Fort Funston to your right
  • Carefully cross the street at the light and enter Fort Funston (read the sign first – some great history here)
  • Stay on the trail to the right – the Coastal Trail – takes you directly to Funston Beach.
  • YOU’RE DONE!
Funston Beach